By Kurt R. Karst – Five-year New Chemical Entity (“NCE”) exclusivity issues are hot – really HOT – these days! Not only are there three Citizen Petitions pending at FDA requesting that the Agency interpret the FDC Act to grant 5-year exclusivity for a fixed-dose …
By Kurt R. Karst – Last Friday, Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) introduced H.R. 2985, the Combination Drug Development Incentive Act of 2013. The bill would amend the 5-year New Chemical Entity (“NCE”) exclusivity provisions of the FDC Act that affect the submission and approval of …
The American Conference Institute (“ACI”) will be holding two events in the coming months that are of particular interest to FDA Law Blog readers. . . . and, importantly, for which our readers can get a discount. The first event is ACI’s Legal, Regulatory, and …
By Kurt R. Karst – Now that we've put the theme from The Jeffersons in your head . . . . On August 2, 2013, FDA will officially announce in a series of Federal Register notices the Fiscal Year 2014 (“FY 2014”) user fee rates under …
By Kurt R. Karst – A series of decisions handed down earlier this week by Judge Mary Jane Bowes of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania arising from mass tort litigation in Philadelphia County involving REGLAN (metoclopramide) and its generic versions can only be drescibed as …
By Kurt R. Karst – FDA’s recent approval of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.’s (“Caraco’s”) ANDA No. 077571 for a generic version of PRANDIN (repaglinide) Tablets is interesting on several fronts. For starters, it is the ANDA at the heart of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision …
By Kurt R. Karst – Touchdown! It was just last month that we posted on the first instance in which FDA resolved what has become known as a “180-day exclusivity punt.” As we explained then, “180-day exclusivity punts” are instances in which a first applicant eligible …
By Kurt R. Karst – You know the drill . . . . One organization comes out with a report saying one thing supported by various data. Days later, another organization comes out with a report saying another thing supported by other data. In what …
By Kurt R. Karst – Although the battle over the appropriate test to apply to drug patent settlement agreements (aka “reverse payment” or “pay-for-delay” settlement agreements) when evaluating whether or not they are immume from antitrust attack ended with the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 17th decision …
By Kurt R. Karst – Back in July 2010 we took a look at the historical growth of so-called “Patent Use Codes” (“PUCs”), those numbers and narratives listed in an Orange Book Addendum corresponding to a listed method-of-use patent. This was long before the U.S. …
By Kurt R. Karst – As you might imagine, we’re pretty avid FDA docket watchers. As followers of this blog know, we track FDA petition decisions and regularly update our popular FDA Citizen Petition Tracker. Keeping close tabs on FDA decisions and announcements posted on …
By Kurt R. Karst – It’s a quiet news week here in the U.S. with the Independence Day holiday approaching. But the news void has given us an opportunity to catch up on a few items we put on a backburner and intended to tackle …
By Kurt R. Karst – It was 75 years ago today, on June 25, 1938, that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed into law the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDC Act”), which replaced the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, 34 Stat. 768, …
By Kurt R. Karst – Shortly after 10:00 AM this morning, the generic drug industry let out a collective sigh of relief. It was at that time the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett (Docket No. 12-0142). …
By Kurt R. Karst – On June 17th, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. ___ (2013) (Docket No. 12-416) concerning drug patent settlement agreements (aka “reverse payment agreements” or “pay-for-delay agreements”). In a 5-3 …
