• where experts go to learn about FDA
  • Hatch-Waxman

    • New Legislation Would Provide Exclusivity Add-on for Significant Drug CombinationsOctober 2nd, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       Legislation co-sponsored by Representatives Brian Bilbray (R-CA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), and supported by the Melanoma Research Foundation, seeks to encourge the development of so-called “significant drug combinations” by offering the carrot of an extension of marketing …

    • Legislative Fix Would Allow FDA to Collect GDUFA User FeesSeptember 19th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       Legislation allowing FDA to collect several user fees under the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012 (“GDUFA”) is expected to be introduced this week (and perhaps voted on by both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate).  …

    • Patent Settlement Agreements: The Next BarrageSeptember 17th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       In our recent post, “Hot Ticket Item – Patent Settlement Agreement Challenges,” we provided a round-up of the latest and greatest from ongoing litigation concerning patent settlement agreements (or “pay-for-delay” agreements if you prefer that term – we don’t).  It’s …

    • The Brand-Name Side of the Exclusivity Equation; Exclusivity Under FireSeptember 10th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –    In the world of Hatch-Waxman, disputes over 180-day generic drug exclusivity have been commonplace for well over a decade now.  Indeed, in 2012 alone there have already been a few lawsuits filed against FDA concerning generic ACTOS and generic PROVIGIL …

    • The Coming 505(q) Citizen Petition Cliff and Some Interesting Petition StrategiesSeptember 4th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       As we patiently await FDA’s next annual report to Congress on 505(q) citizen petitions (see our previous posts on FDA’s annual reports here, here, and here) we thought we would take a minute to share with our readers some observations …

    • Hot Ticket Item – Patent Settlement Agreement ChallengesAugust 30th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       It seems that hardly a day goes by without something new happening concerning patent settlement agreements.  They are generally referred to as “pay-for-delay” agreements; however, that’s a bit of a loaded term, and one we try to avoid.  We just …

    • FDA Gears Up for GDUFA Implementation and ANDAgeddonAugust 23rd, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       In a pair of Federal Register notices (here and here) set for publication on August 27, 2012, and in a pair of draft guidance documents released ahead of their announcement in the Federal Register next week (here and here), FDA …

    • Congressional Interest in FDA Remains High, Even After the Enactment of FDASIAAugust 20th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       Just before Congress recessed for the month of August, and less than a month after the July 9th enactment of the FDA Safety and Innovation Act, several FDA-related bills were placed in the hoppers in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House …

    • Push for 12-Year Biologics Exclusivity in TPP Agreement Continues as the Next Round of Negotiations ApproachesAugust 16th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       Efforts to include a 12-year period of exclusivity for biological products in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (“TPP”) agreement chapter on intellectual property rights are alive and well as folks ramp up for the 14th negotiating round of the TPP, which will take …

    • FDA is Sued Again Over Pre-MMA 180-Day Exclusivity; This Time the Drug is Generic ACTOSAugust 15th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       It’s been nearly nine years since the enactment of the Medicare Modernization Act (“MMA”), which, among other things, changed the regime for 180-day generic drug marketing exclusivity from a “patent-by-patent” approach (under which shared exclusivity can exist for cross-Paragraph IV filers …

    • Running Into a Glass Door (or Window); a Problem With the New “Window ANDA” Forfeiture ProvisionAugust 13th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       That’s the picture conjured up when we plugged some dates into the new model for calculating forfeiture of 180-day generic drug marketing exclusivity for certain ANDAs – what we are calling “window ANDAs” – covered by Section 1133 of the recently …

    • Federal Circuit Rules That Hatch-Waxman “Safe Harbor” is Quite Broad in Dispute Over Enoxaparin Method PatentAugust 7th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       We were eager to delve into the Federal Circuit’s recent 2-1 decision in Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Docket Nos. 2012-1062, -1103, -1104) concernng the scope of the Hatch-Waxman “safe harbor” provision at 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1), particularly in …

    • “Big RLD” Versus “Little rld” – What’s the Difference?August 6th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       There’s a lot of parlance (legal and scientific) bandied about in the food and drug world, and perhaps nowhere more so than in the world of Hatch-Waxman.  Things can get confusing.  Take, for example, the term “Reference Listed Drug,” or “RLD.”  FDA’s …

    • Supreme Court Asked to Take Up Post-Mensing Bartlett Generic Drug Labeling Preemption DecisionAugust 2nd, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       Ever since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued its opinion in May 2012 in Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., ___ F.3d ___, 2012 WL 1522004 (1st Cir. May 2, 2012) denying Mutual Pharmaceutical Company’s (“Mutual’s”) appeal of …

    • STOPP Act Would Establish New Requirements for Tamper-Resistant DrugsJuly 24th, 2012

      By Kurt R. Karst –       Last week, Representative William Keating (D-MA) announced the introduction of new legislation – the Stop Tampering of Prescription Pills Act of 2012, or STOPP Act (H.R. 6160) – that is intended to direct companies “to invest in research and production to …