By Kurt R. Karst – Touchdown! It was just last month that we posted on the first instance in which FDA resolved what has become known as a “180-day exclusivity punt.” As we explained then, “180-day exclusivity punts” are instances in which a first applicant eligible …
By Kurt R. Karst – You know the drill . . . . One organization comes out with a report saying one thing supported by various data. Days later, another organization comes out with a report saying another thing supported by other data. In what …
By Kurt R. Karst – Although the battle over the appropriate test to apply to drug patent settlement agreements (aka “reverse payment” or “pay-for-delay” settlement agreements) when evaluating whether or not they are immume from antitrust attack ended with the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 17th decision …
By Kurt R. Karst – Back in July 2010 we took a look at the historical growth of so-called “Patent Use Codes” (“PUCs”), those numbers and narratives listed in an Orange Book Addendum corresponding to a listed method-of-use patent. This was long before the U.S. …
By Kurt R. Karst – As you might imagine, we’re pretty avid FDA docket watchers. As followers of this blog know, we track FDA petition decisions and regularly update our popular FDA Citizen Petition Tracker. Keeping close tabs on FDA decisions and announcements posted on …
By Kurt R. Karst – It’s a quiet news week here in the U.S. with the Independence Day holiday approaching. But the news void has given us an opportunity to catch up on a few items we put on a backburner and intended to tackle …
By Kurt R. Karst – It was 75 years ago today, on June 25, 1938, that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed into law the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDC Act”), which replaced the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, 34 Stat. 768, …
By Kurt R. Karst – Shortly after 10:00 AM this morning, the generic drug industry let out a collective sigh of relief. It was at that time the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett (Docket No. 12-0142). …
By Kurt R. Karst – On June 17th, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. ___ (2013) (Docket No. 12-416) concerning drug patent settlement agreements (aka “reverse payment agreements” or “pay-for-delay agreements”). In a 5-3 …
By Kurt R. Karst – A Draft Committee Report made available by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations that would, once finalized, accompany the Fiscal Year 2014 Agriculture/FDA Apprropriations bill (currently available as a Full Committee Draft), lays out a laundry list of …
By Kurt R. Karst – In a surprising turn of events, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) sent a letter to Judge Edward R. Korman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York indicating that FDA and HHS have complied with his …
By Kurt R. Karst – Earlier this week, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz Inc. (“Petitioners”) filed their reply to the brief filed late last month by Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Amphastar”) opposing Petitioners’ petition the U.S. Supreme Court to review the August 3, 2012 judgment of …
For years now, the American Conference Institute (“ACI”) has put on a series of excellent FDA-related conferences. Those of us in the Hatch-Waxman world look forward to attending the popular annual Paragraph IV Disputes, Maximizing Pharmaceutical Patent Life Cycles, and Hatch-Waxman Boot Camp conferences. They …
By Kurt R. Karst – Fumble!! For years now we have discussed and tracked various FDA decisions (or non-decisions as the case may be) on what have been referred to as “180-day exclusivity punts.” These are instances in which a first applicant eligible for 180-day …
By Kurt R. Karst – For the third time this year, FDA has been asked to recognize 5-year New Chemical Entity (“NCE”) exclusivity for a fixed-dose combination drug product containing both a never-before-approved active moiety and a previously approved active moiety. In a Citizen Petition …
