• where experts go to learn about FDA
  • Sara W. Koblitz

    • Long Live the Skinny LabelJune 7th, 2026

      The skinny label is back from the dead.  While back in 2021, it seemed like the skinny label was effectively dead after the Federal Circuit twice held Teva liable for induced infringement of GSK’s labeling in GSK v. Teva, the Supreme Court breathed new life …

    • FDA Guidance Sheds (Some) New Light on 3-Year New Clinical Investigation ExclusivityMarch 5th, 2026

      While 3-year new clinical investigation exclusivity has never been the holy grail of exclusivities—we reserve that for 7-year orphan drug exclusivity or 5-year new chemical entity exclusivity (with the plus-5-year GAIN and plus-6-month pediatric exclusivity additions!) because of the different lengths and scopes—it plays an …

    • The Government’s Warning Shot? FDA and HHS Turn Up the Pressure on CompoundingFebruary 23rd, 2026

      Are compounders on notice?  FDA may be coming for at least one of them, with a little help from its friends at the Justice Department. On the heels of the Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy® pill launch, Hims & Hers, in a headscratcher of a promotional move, doubled …

    • Rare Disease Month Developments, Part 2 –The Bad: Proposed Closing of an Orphan User Fee “Loophole” & Renewed Concerns Regarding FDA ConsistencyFebruary 18th, 2026

      February is Rare Disease Month, an important time to celebrate successes in addressing the needs of our fellow 25 to 30 million Americans living with a rare disease, but also to renew our resolve in addressing the much larger remaining challenges – both new and …

    • FDA’s Getting its Fix: The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026February 6th, 2026

      As some of you know, tucked inside the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026, was some legislation that FDA has been pushing for quite some time.  In addition to the incredibly important renewal of the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher program (blog on that forthcoming), …

    • SCOTUS to Hear Skinny Label DisputeJanuary 22nd, 2026

      The skinny label has hit the big time.  Last week, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Hikma v. Amarin to address the burning question of whether a carve-out induces infringement.  As of now, the Federal Circuit has been very clear that a carve-out can induce …

    • When is an Approval Not an Approval? Before 1962.December 10th, 2025

      Priority Review Vouchers (PRV) are incredibly valuable—several have sold for hundreds of millions of dollars.  Which is why it makes sense that Sun Pharma Advanced Research Co. Ltd. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. went to the mat fighting FDA for a PRV for phenobarbital.  And …

    • The Tests They Are A-Changing: FDA Takes Action on BiosimilarsNovember 4th, 2025

      Biosimilars, costing about 50% of their reference products, have generated $56 billion in healthcare savings since 2015, with $20 billion saved in 2024 alone.  Compared to the small molecule market though, that’s pocket change.  It should come as no surprise therefore that FDA is actively …

    • Carve Away: D.C. Circuit Keeping the “Chubby Label” Carve-Out AliveOctober 6th, 2025

      FDA has long permitted ANDA applicants to “carve-out” patent-protected uses from product labeling, resulting in differences between the Reference Listed Drug and the ANDA.  Legal challenges to the carve-out are not new: The GSK v. Teva saga, followed by the Amarin v. Hikma litigation, made …

    • HPM Fact Sheet: Ensuring FDA and HHS Are Held Accountable For “Radical Transparency” and Communicating Truthful and Non-Misleading Information About DTC Rx Drug Ad “Crackdown”September 11th, 2025

      Note:  This HPM Fact Sheet, like HHS’s recently issued Fact Sheet, is intended to bring some radical transparency to the discussion around the recently announced DTC Rx drug ad “crackdown.”  These bloggers thought it would be helpful to clarify some issues.   On September 9, 2025, President …

    • Here FTC Goes Again on Its OwnJune 9th, 2025

      It was about a year and a half ago that we first proclaimed mass hysteria when FTC crossed streams into FDA territory, but perhaps our cries were premature.  As we mentioned last year, a large number of the drug companies targeted by FTC in its …

    • Injunction Junction, What’s Your Function under the Patent Safe Harbor?May 29th, 2025

      In yet another installment of the drama that is Jazz v. Avadel, the Federal Circuit recently reviewed a decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware that addressed the scope of an injunction under the patent safe harbor imposed on Avadel’s Lumryz …

    • What Does the “Most Favored Nation” Executive Order Mean for Personal Use Imports?May 14th, 2025

      We are still parsing through the May 12 Executive Order (EO), “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients” and impacts this may have on the pharmaceutical industry.  We’ve blogged about Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) drug pricing and how the new EO goes well beyond the 2020 …

    • Every Claim You Make, Every Step You Take…CVM Will Be Watching YouApril 8th, 2025

      Promotional claims do not receive the most attention with respect to FDA enforcement these days, and veterinary promotion is no exception.  Indeed, most Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) Warning Letters arise because products advertised are actually new animal drugs.  But this year, CVM has issued …

    • The Issue with Reissue: PTE EditionMarch 19th, 2025

      Integral to the careful balance Congress struck when passing the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, the patent term extension (PTE) is intended to restore patent life that was consumed during regulatory review of an FDA-regulated product.  Even though the PTE provisions established in the Drug Price Competition and …