- DEA To Host Supply Chain Conference March 31, 2023
- 2023 IS the Year for OTC Naloxone! March 30, 2023
- What is Special about September 24, 2023 for the UDI System? March 28, 2023
- The “End of the COVID-19 Emergency and the Ryan Haight Act: Telemedicine and Next Steps” – Availability of HPM’s Presentation Deck and Recording of the Presentation March 28, 2023
- With Oral Argument in Important False Claims Act Case Fast Approaching, A Reminder of the High Stakes March 23, 2023
- Big Molecule Watch Blog
- Bloomberg BNA Health Care Blog
- Drug and Device Law Blog
- Eye on FDA
- FDA Matters
- Harvard Law Bill of Health
- IN VIVO Blog
- Internet Drug News.com
- Lachman Consultants Blog
- Medical Devices Today
- Orange Book Blog
- The Orange Book Insights Blog
- Pharma IQ
- Pharmalot
- SCOTUS Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- WLF Legal Pulse
- Advertising and Promotion (Federal Trade Commission)
- Advertising and Promotion (OPDP)
- Animal Drugs and Feeds
- Biosimilars
- Cannabis
- cGMP Compliance
- Consumer Product Safety Commission
- Controlled Substances
- Cosmetics
- COVID19
- Current Affairs
- Dietary Supplements
- Drug Development
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Enforcement
- FDA News
- Foods
- Foods and Dietary Supplements
- Fraud and Abuse
- Government Pricing
- Hatch-Waxman
- Health Care
- Health Privacy
- Import/Export
- In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
- Jobs
- Medical Devices
- Miscellaneous
- Orphan Drugs
- OTC Drugs and Cosmetics
- Prescription Drugs and Biologics
- Product Jurisdiction and Combination Products
- Reimbursement
- Tissue Products
- Tobacco
- Uncategorized
FTC Wins Summary Judgment Against Marketer of Weight Loss Products
April 27, 2009By John R. Fleder & Ricardo Carvajal —By Ricardo Carvajal & John R. Fleder –
In Federal Trade Commission v. Medlab, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted summary judgment on April 21, 2009, to the FTC in an action against a marketer of weight loss products, which the FTC alleged had engaged in false advertising and deceptive business practices. Defendants claimed in their advertising that their products quickly caused substantial weight loss with no dieting or exercising (and that this effect had been demonstrated in clinical studies), and that their products caused permanent weight loss. In support of its decision, the court cited expert testimony that defendants’ claims were “clearly outside the realm of plausible science.” Both individual and corporate defendants are liable for restitution in the amount of $2.7 million, which the court calculated by reference not just to profits, but to “the full amount lost by consumers.”
Search FDA Law Blog
Subscribe
Latest Tweets
Tweets by @fdalawblogAwards & Honors
- The Best
Lawyers in America
US News & World Report - Ranked in Chambers USA 2018
- DEA To Host Supply Chain Conference March 31, 2023
- 2023 IS the Year for OTC Naloxone! March 30, 2023
- What is Special about September 24, 2023 for the UDI System? March 28, 2023
- The “End of the COVID-19 Emergency and the Ryan Haight Act: Telemedicine and Next Steps” – Availability of HPM’s Presentation Deck and Recording of the Presentation March 28, 2023
- With Oral Argument in Important False Claims Act Case Fast Approaching, A Reminder of the High Stakes March 23, 2023
- Big Molecule Watch Blog
- Bloomberg BNA Health Care Blog
- Drug and Device Law Blog
- Eye on FDA
- FDA Matters
- Harvard Law Bill of Health
- IN VIVO Blog
- Internet Drug News.com
- Lachman Consultants Blog
- Medical Devices Today
- Orange Book Blog
- The Orange Book Insights Blog
- Pharma IQ
- Pharmalot
- SCOTUS Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- WLF Legal Pulse
- Advertising and Promotion (Federal Trade Commission)
- Advertising and Promotion (OPDP)
- Animal Drugs and Feeds
- Biosimilars
- Cannabis
- cGMP Compliance
- Consumer Product Safety Commission
- Controlled Substances
- Cosmetics
- COVID19
- Current Affairs
- Dietary Supplements
- Drug Development
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Enforcement
- FDA News
- Foods
- Foods and Dietary Supplements
- Fraud and Abuse
- Government Pricing
- Hatch-Waxman
- Health Care
- Health Privacy
- Import/Export
- In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
- Jobs
- Medical Devices
- Miscellaneous
- Orphan Drugs
- OTC Drugs and Cosmetics
- Prescription Drugs and Biologics
- Product Jurisdiction and Combination Products
- Reimbursement
- Tissue Products
- Tobacco
- Uncategorized