- To Meet or Not to Meet: Day 70 and Counting July 18, 2025
- Blood Pressure Rising: FDA Warning Letter Takes an Aggressive Approach on General Wellness Product July 17, 2025
- CMS Proposals Would Raise the Bar on Bona Fide Service Fees for Average Sales Price July 16, 2025
- ACI’s Annual Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Forum on Cosmetics & Personal Care Products – West Coast Edition July 15, 2025
- Federal Hiring Shake-Up (Again): What the Latest Executive Action and Supreme Court Decision Mean for Industry July 14, 2025
- Big Molecule Watch Blog
- Bloomberg BNA Health Care Blog
- Drug and Device Law Blog
- Eye on FDA
- FDA Matters
- Harvard Law Bill of Health
- IN VIVO Blog
- Internet Drug News.com
- Lachman Consultants Blog
- Medical Devices Today
- Orange Book Blog
- The Orange Book Insights Blog
- Pharma IQ
- Pharmalot
- SCOTUS Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- WLF Legal Pulse
- Advertising and Promotion (Federal Trade Commission)
- Advertising and Promotion (OPDP)
- Animal Drugs and Feeds
- Biosimilars
- Cannabis
- cGMP Compliance
- Consumer Product Safety Commission
- Controlled Substances
- Cosmetics
- COVID19
- Current Affairs
- Dietary Supplements
- Drug Development
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Enforcement
- FDA News
- Foods
- Foods and Dietary Supplements
- Fraud and Abuse
- Government Pricing
- Hatch-Waxman
- Health Care
- Health Privacy
- Import/Export
- In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
- Jobs
- Medical Devices
- Miscellaneous
- Orphan Drugs
- OTC Drugs and Cosmetics
- Prescription Drugs and Biologics
- Product Jurisdiction and Combination Products
- Reimbursement
- Tissue Products
- Tobacco
- Uncategorized
Supreme Court hears oral argument in Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.
December 4, 2007We previously reported that the Supreme Court had agreed to hear the PMA device preemption case Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. The status of the case was in question earlier this fall because of an untimely motion to substitute the correct party (following the death of the petitioner). The Court exercised its discretion to grant the untimely motion, however. Today, attorneys for the parties, and the Solicitor General’s Office (supporting Medtronic) argued their respective positions before the Court.
Categories: Enforcement
Search FDA Law Blog
Subscribe
Latest Tweets
Tweets by @fdalawblogAwards & Honors
- Best Lawyers in America® – 2025
- Ranked in Chambers USA – 2024
- To Meet or Not to Meet: Day 70 and Counting July 18, 2025
- Blood Pressure Rising: FDA Warning Letter Takes an Aggressive Approach on General Wellness Product July 17, 2025
- CMS Proposals Would Raise the Bar on Bona Fide Service Fees for Average Sales Price July 16, 2025
- ACI’s Annual Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Forum on Cosmetics & Personal Care Products – West Coast Edition July 15, 2025
- Federal Hiring Shake-Up (Again): What the Latest Executive Action and Supreme Court Decision Mean for Industry July 14, 2025
- Big Molecule Watch Blog
- Bloomberg BNA Health Care Blog
- Drug and Device Law Blog
- Eye on FDA
- FDA Matters
- Harvard Law Bill of Health
- IN VIVO Blog
- Internet Drug News.com
- Lachman Consultants Blog
- Medical Devices Today
- Orange Book Blog
- The Orange Book Insights Blog
- Pharma IQ
- Pharmalot
- SCOTUS Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- WLF Legal Pulse
- Advertising and Promotion (Federal Trade Commission)
- Advertising and Promotion (OPDP)
- Animal Drugs and Feeds
- Biosimilars
- Cannabis
- cGMP Compliance
- Consumer Product Safety Commission
- Controlled Substances
- Cosmetics
- COVID19
- Current Affairs
- Dietary Supplements
- Drug Development
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Enforcement
- FDA News
- Foods
- Foods and Dietary Supplements
- Fraud and Abuse
- Government Pricing
- Hatch-Waxman
- Health Care
- Health Privacy
- Import/Export
- In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
- Jobs
- Medical Devices
- Miscellaneous
- Orphan Drugs
- OTC Drugs and Cosmetics
- Prescription Drugs and Biologics
- Product Jurisdiction and Combination Products
- Reimbursement
- Tissue Products
- Tobacco
- Uncategorized